Software

Transcription and voice input: the difference in practice

Mark Vesyoly · founder of Potok · ~8 min

Potok transcribes Russian speech; this site has been translated into English for convenience.

Transcription turns an already finished audio or video recording into text after a conversation; voice input is dictating text in real time straight into a field, where it is inserted as you speak. Potok (potok.now) is a tool of exactly the second type: the Ctrl+Space hotkey, 14 days of full access free, and it does not transcribe already recorded files.

By ear “transcription” and “voice input” sound alike, and both are about turning speech into text, but in practice they are different tasks with different input: in one case the input is a finished recording, in the other live speech right now.

How transcription differs from voice input technically

Transcription is processing an already existing recording: a file from a voice recorder, a Zoom call, a lecture or a podcast. The program receives a whole audio or video file as input, goes through it entirely, often with timestamps and speaker labeling, and returns a finished text document. It can take a couple of minutes or several hours, depending on the length of the recording.

Voice input works differently: it is dictation in real time. The user presses the hotkey, speaks, releases the key, and the text at once appears in the active field of the app where the cursor is: in a search bar, in a chat, in a document. There is no separate file as output, and speaker labeling is not needed, because the speaker is always one and the text is needed at once, not after processing.

In practice the line between the terms is blurred by marketing: some programs in the overview describe themselves with the word “transcription” although in essence they do voice input. In Voisty, for example, the free limit is literally called “5 minutes of transcription to evaluate quality”, although the program itself works as ordinary dictation with a hotkey, not as an uploader of ready files.

When you choose a program, look not at the word in its name but at what it does: it takes a ready file as input (transcription) or turns speech into text as the conversation goes, inserting it straight into a field (voice input). Potok is of the second type: hotkey, dictation, insertion into the active field, without uploading files and without transcribing existing recordings.

When you need transcription and when voice input

You need transcription when the recording already exists and has to be turned into text after the fact: an interview for an article, a call recording, a lecture on a voice recorder, a podcast episode for publication with subtitles. What matters here is the length of the recording, the number of speakers and the accuracy of labeling, who said what and when, while dictation in real time has nothing to do with it, because the conversation is already over.

You need voice input in the opposite situation, when there is no text yet and it is easier to say than to type: a short letter, a message in a messenger, a draft of a document, a note on the go. Timestamps and speakers do not matter here, speed does: you said it and at once saw the finished text in the field you need, without a separate step of “upload a file and wait for processing”. A similar move from typing to speech was covered before in the article about a year and a half without a keyboard.

A borderline case is dictating a long text such as an article or a report: formally this is still voice input, not transcription, because no separate recording file appears, but in volume the task is closer to transcription, and not every program for short phrases holds up under dictation for tens of minutes without losing quality. For such sessions it is worth checking the limit in advance: SpeakFlow and Diktuy give 30 minutes free per month, not per session, and it runs out quickly precisely on long texts.

Calculated from average typing and speaking speeds, not measured.
TaskCharactersTyping (200 chars/min)Voice (900 chars/min)
chat reply3002 min0.5 min
email15008 min1.7 min
post or meeting minutes400020 min4.4 min
article1000050 min11.1 min

When Potok does not fit this task

If you need to transcribe an already existing recording, such as a call, a lecture or an interview from a voice recorder, Potok does not fit: it does only voice input in real time and does not take ready audio files as input, and it has no transcription of recordings. For ready recordings Potok has the Telegram bot @potok_now_bot.

Potok is a cloud service, recognition runs on servers in Russia; it does not work without the internet, so for transcription without a network you also need a separate tool. Of the programs in the overview, the closest to processing sound on the device itself are Molvi and GigaType, but they too are built as voice input, not as an uploader of ready recordings; more on the difference in approaches is in the comparison with GigaType.

Frequently asked questions

Can I transcribe a recording of a conversation with voice input?

Technically no: voice input is built for dictating in real time into the active field, not for taking a finished audio file as input. To transcribe a recording you need a separate transcription tool that can work with files, not only with live speech.

Why do some programs call themselves both voice input and transcription?

Often this is a marketing mix of terms, not two different modes of operation: the program works as ordinary dictation by hotkey, but the limit or the feature is called “transcription” in its description because that word is more familiar to part of the audience.

Can meeting minutes be transcribed through voice input?

With Potok you can dictate the minutes live, speaking them during or right after the meeting. Transcribing an already recorded audio file of a meeting (a finished Zoom or Telemost recording) is a separate transcription task: such a file can be sent to Potok's Telegram bot @potok_now_bot.

How is transcription different from voice input?

Voice input is real-time dictation into the active text field. Transcription turns an already finished audio or video recording (a lecture, a call, a podcast) into text after the fact, often with diarization (splitting by speaker).

Can a Zoom call be transcribed automatically?

Yes, several platforms have built-in meeting transcription: Zoom for cloud recordings, Microsoft Teams during the meeting, Google Meet on Google Workspace plans. The alternative is to record the sound and process it with a separate transcription service after the call. The Potok app does not do this kind of transcription, it is for live dictation; a call recording can be sent as a file to Potok's Telegram bot @potok_now_bot.

What is the difference between voice input and transcription?

Voice input is real-time dictation: you speak and immediately get text in the active field. Transcription turns an already finished audio or video recording (for example, a meeting recording) into text after the fact. The Potok app handles the first task, live dictation; finished recordings in Russian are transcribed by its Telegram bot @potok_now_bot.

Transcribe your own recording

Forward a voice message, or send a file or a YouTube, VK Video or RuTube link to Potok's Telegram bot, and the text arrives in the same chat. 60 minutes per month for free.

Open @potok_now_bot in Telegram

Related software: terms compared

Terms are taken from the services' official websites.
ServicePlatformsFreePricePayment from RussiaWhere speech is recognized
Potok bot and web versionTelegram (@potok_now_bot, mini app inside the bot)60 minutes per month7 days: 249 ₽, 30 days: 449 ₽, one year: 2 890 ₽; included in the Potok app subscriptionRussian bank cards, rublescloud, servers in Russia; internet required
Telegram voice message transcriptionTelegramwithout Premium, a few transcriptions per week; with Premium, no limit on their number—not disclosedTelegram servers
SaluteSpeech Bot (Sber)Telegramfree; voice messages, audio and video notes—not disclosedSaluteSpeech cloud (Sber)
Voicy (@voicybot)Telegramfree; on the Wit.ai engine, recordings of up to 50 seconds—not disclosedWit.ai, Yandex SpeechKit or Google Speech; the user chooses the engine
Voix (@RecogMyAudioBot)Telegramvoice messages up to 15 minutes, video up to 6 minutes—not disclosednot disclosed
Voicee (@Voicee_AI_Bot)Telegram, Web45 minutes to start500 ₽/hour of recording (without a package; cheaper with packages)rublesnot disclosed
KolerskyAI Whisper BotTelegramthe first 5 minutes69 ₽/15 minutes; 149 ₽/50 minutes; 490 ₽/200 minutesrublesnot disclosed
Transkribator (@gotranscribeai_bot)Telegram, Max3 transcriptions per month—not disclosednot disclosed

Primary sources: core.telegram.org · www.ixbt.com · developers.sber.ru · t.me

Transcribe a recording in Telegram

Voice messages, video notes, audio and video are transcribed by Potok's Telegram bot @potok_now_bot: forward it a voice message from any chat, or send a file or a YouTube, VK Video or RuTube link. A short recording comes back as text in the chat, a long one as a file; timestamps and speaker labels can be turned on. The buttons give a short summary, tasks and deadlines, an answer to a question about the recording and export to TXT, DOCX, PDF or SRT. Large files, up to 2 GB, are easier to upload in the bot's mini app, via the Upload button next to the input field. The bot recognizes Russian speech; 60 minutes per month are free.

Mark Vesyoly — founder of Potok. Writes about Russian voice input: how to dictate in work apps, what gets in the way and how to fix it.
© Potok · Vladimir Olegovich Lipatnikov · INN 502915859701 · Public offer Comparisons · FAQ · About Free voice input · Voice input for AI chats · Data and Russian privacy law · Voice input on Mac · Bot plans · 14 days of Pro for a review